| re: Jim would be nothing with Meat | |
|
Posted by: |
Pudding 10:17 pm UTC 05/26/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - lotus_nz 09:28 pm UTC 05/26/08 |
| I love these 'who made who' arguments as there's never a winner. Simple fact is though, Jims' had more success without Meat than Meat has without Jim. Of course Bat1 propelled both of them to what they became, so I think it's fair to say that they both made each other. Jim was the organ (piano) grinder and Meat was the...well you get the picture ;o) > fella not starting any shit, between sucking Jims cock you > should look at what Jim would have done without Meat loaf, > would total eclipse have even interested B.T...Celine > would have said Jim who. > > > > > I know you are just a troll trying to start shit. But Jim > > had huge hits with plenty of other artists. Total Eclipse > > was about as big a hit as Jim has ever had. Celine, Air > > Supply, Boyzone, Meat Loaf, Tanz... what has Meat done > > without Jim? Spice World? > > > > > love them both but without Meat Jim would not be who he is > > > today, and the same can be said of Meat Loaf. > > > > > > Bat out of hell the musical will not be sucessfull without > > > Meat loaf , it will flop. > > > > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - lotus_nz 09:28 pm UTC 05/26/08 |
| Next: | re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - rockfenris2005 10:41 am UTC 05/28/08 |
| Thread: |
|