HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim would be nothing with Meat

Posted by:
Pudding 10:17 pm UTC 05/26/08
In reply to: re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - lotus_nz 09:28 pm UTC 05/26/08

I love these 'who made who' arguments as there's never a winner. Simple fact is though, Jims' had more success without Meat than Meat has without Jim. Of course Bat1 propelled both of them to what they became, so I think it's fair to say that they both made each other.

Jim was the organ (piano) grinder and Meat was the...well you get the picture ;o)

> fella not starting any shit, between sucking Jims cock you
> should look at what Jim would have done without Meat loaf,
> would total eclipse have even interested B.T...Celine
> would have said Jim who.
>
>
>
> > I know you are just a troll trying to start shit. But Jim
> > had huge hits with plenty of other artists. Total Eclipse
> > was about as big a hit as Jim has ever had. Celine, Air
> > Supply, Boyzone, Meat Loaf, Tanz... what has Meat done
> > without Jim? Spice World?
> >
> > > love them both but without Meat Jim would not be who he is
> > > today, and the same can be said of Meat Loaf.
> > >
> > > Bat out of hell the musical will not be sucessfull without
> > > Meat loaf , it will flop.
> > >
> > >
> > >


reply |

Previous: re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - lotus_nz 09:28 pm UTC 05/26/08
Next: re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - rockfenris2005 10:41 am UTC 05/28/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE