not logged in
| re: Jim would be nothing with Meat | |
Posted by:  |
wenners 03:01 pm UTC 05/27/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - Pudding 08:19 pm UTC 05/26/08 |
| i dont think you can compare single sales from then and now, lets face it now days you only need to sell 2 singles to have a number 1, > If you're going to use chart statistics to try and prove a > point then you need to get your facts correct. None of the > songs from Bat1 were really deemed chart successes (Took > The Words #33, 2 Out Of 3 #32 and Bat #15) > > You would've been better saying that Meat had more > 'single' chart success with his last two albums > (forgetting Bat3) without Jim than he did with the first > two albums with Jim (UK based chart positions) > > #33 You Took The Words Right Out Of My Mouth May 1978 > #32 Two Out Of Three Ain't Bad Aug 1978 > #15 Bat Out Of Hell Feb 1979 > # 5 Dead Ringer For Love Nov 1981 > > > # 2 I'd Lie For You (And That's The Truth) Oct 1995 > # 7 Not A Dry Eye In The House Jan 1996 > #21 Runnin' For The Red Light (I Gotta Life) Apr 1996 > > #31 Couldn't Have Said It Better Apr 2003 > #21 Man Of Steel Dec 2003 > > > > Jim has had most success with Meat then anybody > > else.....Yes he has had hits with other artists 2 with > > bonnie, 1 with Air Supply and 1 eith Celine and i wont > > count Boyzone b/c that never made it to the U.S. I believe > > lets see what hits he had with Meat Loaf - The entire Bat > > 1 album, some of Bat 2 not ill list the songs Meat Loaf > > made famous for Jim > > > > Anything for Love > > Paradise > > Bat > > 2 outta 3 > > You took the owrds > > Rock N Roll Dreams > > Objects > > > > SO in my opinion, yes Jim has only had what? 5 songs top > > that have had success without Meat Loafs vocals, im n ot > > bashing Jim but u guys just tear Meat apart and thik Jim > > would have done just as well without Meat, well no offense > > he wouldnt of, just like Meat wouldnt of done as well > > without Jim. > > > > Lets look at Meats side now > > > > HEs had an acting career for over 30 + years and singing, > > he does movies not just singing, people actually KNOW his > > name and can point him out when hearing him sing. Just > > face it both men need each other to go out with a bang.... > > i just wish u guys would get over the Bat 3 problem, i > > believe Jim has, so stop trying to kiss ass and dont get > > so offended when someone tlks well of MEat, and the same > > for Jim.....Im not bashing either men, i just brought both > > their flaws to the table and hopefully during this reall > > long post it made some sense! > > > > > Hmm, if the big guy fails to deliver good vocals on this > > > current tour i reckon he'll be all washed up. > > > > > > How is he gonna take to a West End stage singing night > > > after night, maybe even matinee performances, when he > > > can't even complete a short tour without his voice turning > > > to shit. > > > > > > The demands of a show will far exceed his abilities now, > > > for fucks sake he's only 4 years from a bus pass. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - Pudding 12:12 am UTC 05/29/08 |
| Next: | re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - Pudding 06:48 pm UTC 05/27/08 |
| Thread: |
|