HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim would be nothing with Meat

Posted by:
wenners 03:09 pm UTC 05/27/08
In reply to: Jim would be nothing with Meat - lotus_nz 11:03 pm UTC 05/25/08

First of all without Meat, Jim would be a vegetarian.

I love the fact that people will waste there time trying to justify who they like the most, they come up with all these pointless arguments and what ifs.

To try to surmise who would be more successful or better is a complete waste of time.

All I am glad is they met and delivered in my opinion the greatest album of all time, and you know what the songs on bat 2 and dead ringer are also pretty amazing as well


> love them both but without Meat Jim would not be who he is
> today, and the same can be said of Meat Loaf.
>
> Bat out of hell the musical will not be sucessfull without
> Meat loaf , it will flop.
>
>
>


reply |

Previous: re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - tragichippy 08:15 pm UTC 05/28/08
Next: re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - Pudding 05:03 am UTC 05/26/08

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE