HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim would be nothing with Meat

Posted by:
tragichippy 08:16 pm UTC 05/28/08
In reply to: re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - Pudding 08:19 pm UTC 05/26/08


> If you're going to use chart statistics to try and prove a
> point then you need to get your facts correct. None of the
> songs from Bat1 were really deemed chart successes (Took
> The Words #33, 2 Out Of 3 #32 and Bat #15)

Bat hit #8 in the 90s, didn't it?


reply |
Previous: re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - Pudding 08:19 pm UTC 05/26/08
Next: re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - Pudding 12:12 am UTC 05/29/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE