HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Bette Midler

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 10:54 am UTC 05/29/08
In reply to: Bette Midler - Scaramouche 10:51 am UTC 05/29/08


> I disagree. Heard a Steinman radio interview (around Bat 2
> time) where he clearly stated Bette demoed the track (with
> Jim producing). He said she kept taking the piss of the
> 'sureal' lyrics and whining about where her demo fee was
> ($400.00 I think was mentioned).

Oh, really? You're probably right then. I wonder why she hasn't released it.
>
> I meant it was disappointing in only having four new
> songs.

I hardly even notice it, strangely enough. It's like "Anything For Love" and "Objects In The Rear View Mirror" play and you forgive Jim everything. Notice how "The Final At Bat" had a lot more material that would have been new to the general public? This, to me, indicates that Jim had a lot more passion about this project (obviously if he had so much new material) which is why it frustrates me immensely that the world never got to hear it and had to put up with Meat's shitty offering.
>
> Maybe, but there are far more options for songs if a
> Neverland concept was done. In any case, you could pull in
> 'Permitted' & 'Kill You' from Deadringer.

Hmmm... but there is still potential from "Dead Ringer". I don't know, something has to be done about that album.




reply |

Previous: Bette Midler - Scaramouche 10:51 am UTC 05/29/08
Next: re: Bette Midler - tragichippy 08:21 pm UTC 05/29/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE