| re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 08:13 pm UTC 06/02/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? - Smeghead 07:16 pm UTC 06/02/08 |
| Oh. Now, I always thought it was "I'll be it." As in, an amicable and selfless way to settle a dispute over who tagged whom, for the sake of the orderly continuation of the game. > Just for your enlightenment, the word is albeit not "all > be it" > > > Not being a huge fan of all these talent shows that are > > constantly on our screens,whether you like them or not > > they do succeed in producing huge publicity and also > > create a star, All be it in a lot of cases short lived. > > With all the talk of Andrew Lloyd Webber taking a > > sabbatical to do phantom part deux or even even not > > returning in the future at all is there an opportunity > > for some one else to proceed over the proceedings and > > replace Lord Webber, perhaps the Lord of Excess Mr > > Steinman? > > > > Maybe the preparations for Bat the musical is not far > > enough down the road, but what a great opportunity to > > create public interest > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? - Smeghead 07:16 pm UTC 06/02/08 |
| Next: | re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? - wenners 08:10 pm UTC 06/02/08 |
| Thread: | |