not logged in
| re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? | |
Posted by:  |
wenners 05:20 pm UTC 06/04/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? - Smeghead 10:46 am UTC 06/04/08 |
| Sensitive, once again you flatter yourself. The fact that you chose to correct a grammatical error rather than respond to the substance written in the thread itself suggest that you feel there is a need to impose what you feel is your far greater intellectual intelligence on others. You obviously suffer from a very low self esteem and feel the need to boost this when ever possible. Now if we were posting on a literature website your correction would be both warranted and appreciated, but as were not it just makes you look like a pompass ass. > A dime? Phone call cost more than a dime when I was a > kid. I was just politely informing you of something. I > was not rude about it at all. The fact that you were so > sesetive about it is your issue. I don't go around > pointing out grammatical errors and typos. Just saw a > chance to help someone out. Jesus! > > > You obviously have a very high opinion of yourself if you > > feel your need to make a correction to my grammar would > > have any profound effect on me. > > All it shows is your ignorance to the fact that nobody > > really gives a rat’s arse. > > But feel free to point out if you see any further spelling > > mistakes or grammatical errors and also feel free to post > > your address so I can send you a dime for you to call > > someone who actually gives a fuck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wow ill be able to sleep tonight thank you, > > > > > > Sorry if a little education rubs you the wrong way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just for your enlightenment, the word is albeit not "all > > > > > be it" > > > > > > > > > > > Not being a huge fan of all these talent shows that are > > > > > > constantly on our screens,whether you like them or not > > > > > > they do succeed in producing huge publicity and also > > > > > > create a star, All be it in a lot of cases short lived. > > > > > > With all the talk of Andrew Lloyd Webber taking a > > > > > > sabbatical to do phantom part deux or even even not > > > > > > returning in the future at all is there an opportunity > > > > > > for some one else to proceed over the proceedings and > > > > > > replace Lord Webber, perhaps the Lord of Excess Mr > > > > > > Steinman? > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe the preparations for Bat the musical is not far > > > > > > enough down the road, but what a great opportunity to > > > > > > create public interest > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? - Smeghead 10:46 am UTC 06/04/08 |
| Next: | re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? - rockfenris2005 09:47 am UTC 06/05/08 |
| Thread: |
|