sorry ignore that bit where I tell you what you already know about it being form the early 90s. :oP
>
> Oh, no argument here that Innuendo is the best they did.
> It's unbelievable. And it was the early 90s by the way.
>
> You can put your fingers in your ears and ignore Queen +
> Paul Rodgers all you like (not MY choice, personally I'll
> be buying the album the day it comes out) but I don;t
> understand your objection to Made In Heaven? It's their
> best selling album EVER apparently. It rocks, it's truly
> great. The fact that they re-recorded (with original vocal
> take) a bunch of stuff that had previously been released
> getting you down?
>
> Not all that different to Jim re-voicing a bunch of stuff
> that had already been released? :o)
>
> >
> > David Richards did "Innuendo"? I didn't even know that and
> > that was one of my favourite albums (LOL, you'll notice,
> > over time, I will say that a lot. But it's true.)
> > "Innuendo" was, IMO, the best Queen album of the 80s. I
> > couldn't get into the other stuff and felt that the magic
> > died with "Jazz" and "Flash Gordon". "I'm Going Slightly
> > Mad" and "The Show Must Go On" are daily anthems in my
> > life. So if Richards did "Innuendo", he could have done
> > great work here. Btw. I don't believe in "Made In Heaven"
> > or any of the planned work with Paul Rodgers. Queen, IMHO,
> > recorded their last album in 1991 and they haven't done
> > anything since.
> >
> > >
> > > David Richards has also worked with Queen. He did The
> > > Miracle and Innuendo! and Made in Heaven, too! And around
> > > the same time he did the absolutely fantastic OUTSIDE with
> > > David Bowie and Brian Eno. Since then I'm not sure what
> > > he's done to be honest? Excuse me whilst I google a
> > > li'l...
> > >
|
