HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: What I MEANT to say was...

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 09:50 am UTC 06/15/08
In reply to: re: What I MEANT to say was... - Wilbury 09:22 am UTC 06/15/08


I have no idea what they decided upon. Jim seems to allude to it in his entries but that's all

> You're seriously saying that the out of court settlement
> for jim consisted solely of the right to use his own
> copyright,

Again, I don't know, no one does, but Jim is most definitely using "Bat Out Of Hell" for his stage spectacular. Meat hasn't used it since TMIL. Notice how the DVD was called 3 Bats etc. etc.

> the inability to stop Meat using his copyright on Bat 3: > The Monster is Loose, and forfeiting the right to comment publicly.

Meat DID release TMIL with the Bat III name on it. He also commented a great deal about the project, being a Bat III album also (which it isn't. Everyone knows that it isn't a Bat album. It's like how everyone knows a Mona Lisa fake when they see one.)





reply |

Previous: re: What I MEANT to say was... - rockfenris2005 09:23 am UTC 06/16/08
Next: re: What I MEANT to say was... - Wilbury 10:03 am UTC 06/15/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE