| re: What I MEANT to say was... | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 09:50 am UTC 06/15/08 |
| In reply to: | re: What I MEANT to say was... - Wilbury 09:22 am UTC 06/15/08 |
I have no idea what they decided upon. Jim seems to allude to it in his entries but that's all > You're seriously saying that the out of court settlement > for jim consisted solely of the right to use his own > copyright, Again, I don't know, no one does, but Jim is most definitely using "Bat Out Of Hell" for his stage spectacular. Meat hasn't used it since TMIL. Notice how the DVD was called 3 Bats etc. etc. > the inability to stop Meat using his copyright on Bat 3: > The Monster is Loose, and forfeiting the right to comment publicly. Meat DID release TMIL with the Bat III name on it. He also commented a great deal about the project, being a Bat III album also (which it isn't. Everyone knows that it isn't a Bat album. It's like how everyone knows a Mona Lisa fake when they see one.) | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: What I MEANT to say was... - rockfenris2005 09:23 am UTC 06/16/08 |
| Next: | re: What I MEANT to say was... - Wilbury 10:03 am UTC 06/15/08 |
| Thread: |
|