| re: mis-interpretations here, IMO | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 09:43 am UTC 07/02/08 |
| In reply to: | re: mis-interpretations here, IMO - Wilbury 09:03 am UTC 07/02/08 |
> Yeah I like your devil's advocate efforts, but surely if > she's recording songs with Jo Schmo Producer Guy whilst > waiting around for Jim she could / WOULD have tonnes of > songs by now. > > I mean she's been talking about the new album for ages > now. > Maybe that's the reason why she's not recording much. She's waiting round for Jim, she thinks Jim will deliver and, hence, no excessive amounts of recording because whoever's in charge will have too much to choose on. If I know Jim, judging on everything that's happened this century, I can almost predict what's going to happen. Bonnie's album will come out at the end of 2009 with A) Absolutely no contributions from Jim Steinman, B) Bonnie records a few covers of his songs, C) Jim miraculously producers his contributions but they're songs we've all heard before or D) They'll be some kind of fallout in which we'll eventually hear the tracks, thanks to sites like Vaults of Heaven and The Proof is in The Pudding. You become so pessimistic when you think of what exactly Jim's achieved this century (MILLENNIUM) but, of course, you still hope. I'm not hoping. I've grown tired of waiting. I wanted to hear the studio "Body" yesterday, wait, three and a half years ago. I should have been sitting here listening to "The Final At Bat" with all the material Jim talked about. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: mis-interpretations here, IMO - Wilbury 09:03 am UTC 07/02/08 |
| Next: | re: New Bonnie Tyler Record.... - Markus 01:17 pm UTC 07/01/08 |
| Thread: | |