re: Grammar in "Left in the Dark" | |
Posted by: ![]() |
SeeingI 01:59 pm UTC 02/02/07 |
In reply to: | re: Grammar in "Left in the Dark" - Unno 07:50 pm UTC 01/30/07 |
Give me the future with a modern grammarian! > Actually, most moderns grammarians would accept words like > "them," "they," etc. as proper third person singular > forms. Prescriptivism is pretty much dead now. Still, I > know what you mean. I still mutter "well" under my breath > when someone uses good adverbally without a linking verb. > > Unno > > > > > > > If grammar rules truly kept up with spoken language, there > > would be a gender-neutral term for third person. People > > say, "If anyone wants a cookie, they can get it > > themselves" instead of "he or she can get it for him or > > herself." I know which one I and everybody else says, but > > I also know which one is technically "correct." | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Grammar in "Left in the Dark" - Unno 07:50 pm UTC 01/30/07 |
Next: | For Jim: Some horror stuff - Brian 09:15 am UTC 01/26/07 |
Thread: |