| re: Who's faster, Meat or Jim? |
|
Posted by:
 |
Pudding 10:08 am UTC 07/26/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: Who's faster, Meat or Jim? - lotus_nz 07:55 am UTC 07/26/08 |
|
I'm fairly convinced Jim doesn't actually have a bitch, but if he did then I'm also convinced Smeg wouldn't be it. And as for sucking cock, I'm also convinced Jim could get a better offer elsewhere.
> you bitter wanker smeg.. keep on sucking on Jim cock.. you
> bitch
> > Like Bat II vs. Bat3... It may take forever, but when Jim
> > actually does create something it ain't shit. Meat goes
> > into a studio, warbles out two takes of crap and gives
> > some poor engineer a couple of months to try to make him
> > sound as in tune as possible then Meat does a media blitz
> > full of lies to try to trick as many people into buying
> > his shit as possible.
> >
> > > What will we get first, The Bat out of Hell musical or
> > > Bull in a China Shop?
> > >
> > > I take bets! ;o)
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Who's faster, Meat or Jim? - lotus_nz 07:55 am UTC 07/26/08 |
| Next: |
re: Who's faster, Meat or Jim? - Wilbury 11:57 pm UTC 07/25/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|