I'm not talking about you, I'm talking BOUT all the Loafers who thought Jim was in constant consultation with Meat and was offering him the role of Peter.
And I simply disagree that having Meat involved, even in a non-creative small way is in any way good for Jim.
Meat has proven with Bat 3 he can't sell something.
> How was you right?
>
> People are saying it would make total sense if he was
> involved in some small capacity, non-creative role of
> course, they never said that he is involved.
>
> Your dislike for Meat Loaf Smeg really is your downfall.
> So you don't like the bloke, why not think of Jim and what
> would be the best for him and his interests now and for
> the future and NOT yours.
>
> You must be living in cloudcuckooland if you really think
> the public are going to give two fucks that Jim wrote Bat
> Out Of Hell. BOOH is associated more with Meat (I don't
> like the fact either) so accept it, get over it and move
> on.
>
>
> > So all of you who were insisting that it made total sense
> > for him to be involved with the musical are now ignoring
> > the fact that he is now admitting I WAS RIGHT!
> >
> > > Smeg
> > >
> > > you really are a wanker
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Once again when Meat gets called on a lie he claims the
> > > > press mis-quoted him. Maybe it is true... But I doubt it.
> > > > ANd he never said Sixx outwrote Steinman...
> > > >
> > > > > Here's Meat Loaf's reaction of the BOOH musical quote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What I said was "I was not involved in the Musical" but I
> > > > > would be at the opening.
> > > > > M
|
