| re: The Dark Knight |
|
Posted by:
 |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 08:37 pm UTC 08/16/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: The Dark Knight - Smeghead 08:20 pm UTC 08/15/08 |
|
So a film where the characters have absolutely no depth and a piece of shit plot is more your style. Aren’t you a trooper.
> I haven't seen it either... I don't do movies in
> theaters... but it is my understanding it is much darker.
> I don't really like "Dark" superheroes... Burton's take
> was more my style.
>
> > I still haven't seen the new film, but is it really much
> > darker than Burton's? That would be saying something.
> > In any case, Jim can do dark just fine. Its not like his
> > Batman demos are better suited for Adam West than
> > Christian Bale.
> >
> > > Because Rinkoff did so well at getting the Dream Engine
> > > off the ground. Jim really should just hire a manager who
> > > knows what he is doing!
> > >
> > > Though the WB execs would probably want a whole new Batman
> > > that is Darker like the movies now and not based on the
> > > Burton Batman.
> > >
> > > > That's a good point. If Sonnenberg isn't working to make
> > > > Batman happen than Rinkoff should take over and just pitch
> > > > it himself!
> > > >
> > > > -=John Galt=-
> > > >
> > > > > Thought Question:
> > > > >
> > > > > Given the phenomenal success of this movie, is it
> > > > > conceivable that there isn't at least ONE money-grubbing
> > > > > executive over at Warner Bros. who ISN'T thinking about
> > > > > reviving the Batman musical project?
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think it is.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: The Dark Knight - Smeghead 08:20 pm UTC 08/15/08 |
| Next: |
re: The Dark Knight - Smeghead 12:57 am UTC 08/17/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|