| re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) |
|
Posted by:
 |
Macahan 11:23 am UTC 08/17/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Marvello 10:15 am UTC 08/17/08 |
|
Poor doesn't begin to describe it. Try the link to the translated review of the night before. It's not good english obviously, but you get the point.
> I take it you witnessed a piss poor performance from the
> big guy?
>
> > I'm not that much into the legal of songwriting, but isn't
> > it true that you can perform a persons song without
> > permission if they're published, but if you alter them you
> > should ask permission ? What I heard last night was NOT
> > Jim's songs and he should get an injunction that prohibits
> > Meat from performing them in public ever again. Even if he
> > doensn't win it would make great headlines and everyone
> > who attened this last tour will nod their head and think
> > "way to go,Jim".
|
|
| URL: |
Review in BT |
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Marvello 10:15 am UTC 08/17/08 |
| Next: |
re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Rob 11:50 am UTC 08/17/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|