re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Macahan 12:27 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
In reply to: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 12:04 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Right, Smeg :-) > I thgink all these newspaper reviews who write bad reviews > of Meat saying he can no longer sing should stop writing > these things. It is obvious they just have some kind or > tourettes and bias against Meat. They just don't > understand his greatness and passion and that he is the > only person who can sing Jim's songs and that Jim is > doomed to failures greater than those he achieved with > Bonnie Tyler, Boyzone, Barry Manilow, Celine Dion, and Air > Supply if he doesn't record another albuym with Meat. > > > I'm not that much into the legal of songwriting, but isn't > > it true that you can perform a persons song without > > permission if they're published, but if you alter them you > > should ask permission ? What I heard last night was NOT > > Jim's songs and he should get an injunction that prohibits > > Meat from performing them in public ever again. Even if he > > doensn't win it would make great headlines and everyone > > who attened this last tour will nod their head and think > > "way to go,Jim". | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Belmont 10:50 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Next: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Marvello 10:15 am UTC 08/17/08 |
Thread: |