HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again)

Posted by:
Scaramouche 03:12 pm UTC 08/17/08
In reply to: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 01:03 pm UTC 08/17/08

> He got divorced... and doesn't he live in California?...
> that would mean Leslie probably got evereything...

Never heard/read anything as to why they divorced. Anyone know?

> (some of his Bat 3 studio vocals are pretty decent?).
> Since that was stated as a question it sounds like you are
> unsure. I woulkd answer... No, they are awful...

Well 'awful' is harsh.

There isn't one COMPLETE song where the vocal is superb, but there are plenty of 'sections' where the vocal is a lot better than 'stuff in the charts'.

I like his vocal on 'Alive' & 'Pig' (though, not as good as Rob Evan).

If Jim produces a Bat concept album, Meat would probably only be given one song, and therefore would probably tolerate lots of takes.

Jim could then easily 'comp' together a more than decent vocal (which is what he did on the majority of Bat 2).





reply |

Previous: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 01:03 pm UTC 08/17/08
Next: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - RadioMaster 01:00 pm UTC 08/17/08

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE