>
> I agree. But as long as it carries the title Bat out of
> Hell you'll have to deal with the name Meat Loaf as well.
Having to deal with Meat and promoting the Musical as having something to do with Meat are two different things. If you link it with Meat in any way other than to point out that the musical has nothing to do with Meat Loaf you are only harming your chances long run. DOTV thought Mikey Boy was enough to sell tickets. When people saw the show was not Phantom of the Opera 2 and that Mikey Boy's normal Blue Haired fans would not enjoy a really bad comedy with Rock music sung by an old fart with Piles the ticket sales dried up. Just as... if you sell Neverland as a Meat Loaf musical and then the fans of Loaf find out it has nothing to do with their Tone Deaf God they will quickly abandon the show and it will flop. You can't fool people into buying something. Loaf tried that with Bat 3. You have to sell it to its audience. And the average Loaf fan isn't really a fan of Musicals.
>
>
>
> > Everytime Meat gets caught lying he claims the press made
> > it up... I can see the press getting facts wrong...but why
> > would they say "Meat is in contact with Jim Steinman via
> > e-mail about the musical" if Meat didn't claim this.
>
> Well, apparently this was a scandinavian interview, and
> the interviewers mother language isnt english. So it's
> quite possible that he misunderstood "is" with "isnt" or
> something similar.
> If he had made it up why would the next thing be stating
> that this was a misquote?
>
> That said, these are all just assumptions, I have no idea
> if Im right or not, maybe he made it up, maybe he didnt.
> But we dont know.
>
|
