| re: BAT OUT OF HELL ETC |
|
Posted by:
 |
Smeghead 07:32 pm UTC 09/10/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: BAT OUT OF HELL ETC - steven_stuart 06:47 pm UTC 09/10/08 |
|
I believe DOTV was $15 and that was in New York, not the West End and it was the most expensive of its time... and honestly I couldn't see where the money went to there... except Crawford's bank account.
> It does sound like an awful lot of money. Lord Of The
> Rings spent that much but it didn't help them. Although
> their songs were boring and it was meant to be a musical.
> At least Bat Out Of Hell will have some fantastic songs.
> But 20 million dollars (ten million pounds)? That is just
> too much. I totally agree with Smeghead. Surely they can
> cut the budget.
>
> > If it takes till 2012 I say it doesn't happen at all. $20
> > mil is a mistake. There is no reason for a budget that
> > big... What are you spending it on?
> >
>
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: BAT OUT OF HELL ETC - steven_stuart 06:47 pm UTC 09/10/08 |
| Next: |
re: BAT OUT OF HELL ETC - Pudding 02:04 am UTC 09/11/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|