| re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" | |
|
Posted by: |
lotus_nz 08:37 pm UTC 09/10/08 |
| In reply to: | re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" - Pudding 07:39 am UTC 09/10/08 |
| a bit part , could be present on the opening night, ive never thought that he would be in the show. hope that clears it up. > Neither can 80% of the shite that's in the charts. > > > HE CAN'T FUGGIN SING, or is it gonna be DR all over again, > > a cut and paste job. > > > > > > SMEG BAT THE MUSICAL WITHOUT MEAT LOAF HAVING A BIT PART > > > > WILL FLOP, most of us are onboard with it , > > > > > > Whooooaaaaaa! Hold your Blackpool donkey there fella! I > > > never said nor do I agree Meat having a bit part in the > > > musical. If Meat wants to help promote it in some way then > > > fine. If Jim has Meat record a song or two from it that'll > > > be part of this mystical 'Conclusions & Climaxes' that's > > > been mentioned then fine. But NO bit part as in something > > > to do with him being on stage during the preformance. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" - Pudding 07:39 am UTC 09/10/08 |
| Next: | re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" - Smeghead 09:43 pm UTC 09/10/08 |
| Thread: |
|