| re: The 'Ray' Factor |
|
Posted by:
 |
Pudding 12:34 am UTC 09/11/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: The 'Ray' Factor - Smeghead 12:01 am UTC 09/11/08 |
|
> From what I understand the lawyers just fabricated
> > stuff, even without Meat's involvement.
>
> That's Meat's claim, but he signed his name to it. If he
> signs his name to it without reading it he is as guilty
> as if he said it himself.
Naive and stupid isn't the same as being guilty.
> Or it could be the fact that he actually had to agree in
> his court settlement not to say anything negative about
> Bat 3.
Or it could be the fact that you don't know what Jim had to or didn't have to agree to but it sounds good anyway when talking shit.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: The 'Ray' Factor - rockfenris2005 02:31 am UTC 09/11/08 |
| Next: |
If they did that to my songs - rockfenris2005 02:21 am UTC 09/11/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|