| re: for pudding | |
|
Posted by: |
lotus_nz 03:00 am UTC 09/11/08 |
| In reply to: | re: for pudding - Pudding 01:34 am UTC 09/11/08 |
| middle of the day for me, only negative i have on meat loaf is he is sounding poor at the moment and i am in to minds if i would see him if he came to NZ, the rest that everyone ( smeg) argues over is hear say and until jim and meat confirm or deny it i could not give a toss. > I have no idea who it is, but I'd have thought Porkington > would be getting some much needed beauty sleep at 1:45am > because the post was written 12:45pm New Zealand time. > > Also this person hasn't slammed Meat Loaf, which is > extremely strange for Porkington. > > > Does the writing style look familiar to you? It resembles > > some PM's Porkington sent my YouTube account once. > > > > > > fella how is life in new zealand , and if you come to > > > > Auckland ( shit hole) look me up and i will buy you a beer > > > > if you bring your secret stash of jim demos . > > > > > > I lived in Auckland for over 2 years, I've no desire to go > > > back there anytime soon. > > > > > > I don't have a secret stash of demo's, everything and > > > anything I have gets hoofed onto the blog, as I like to > > > spread the Steinlove around (that sounds a bit gay) > > > Talking of my blog, I think I have a couple of shitty > > > TEOTH covers to put up. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: for pudding - AndrewG 11:31 pm UTC 09/11/08 |
| Next: | The Truth is.. - Jsteinfan 11:57 pm UTC 09/10/08 |
| Thread: | |