| re: Cut off end of sentence by mistake |
|
Posted by:
 |
Pudding 03:58 am UTC 09/11/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: Cut off end of sentence by mistake - wordnix 02:21 am UTC 09/11/08 |
|
Please explain what non-active involvement is.
> Did I say ACTIVE involvement? Involvement is involvement,
> no matter how you slice it. If Paul writes a song and an
> artist covers it, he's involved. If John were to write a
> song for an artist, he's involved. Directly or indirectly
> is immaterial for everyone except some.
>
> > > I don't think he had to try anything. Jim wrote seven
> > > songs that were used on the album. That's involvement,
> > > whether he's in the studio actively or not.
> >
> > Hang on. If Britney Spears did an album with 7 Beatles
> > songs on it no one in their right mind would think John
> > Lennon or Paul McCartney was involved with it.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Cut off end of sentence by mistake - Smeghead 11:13 am UTC 09/11/08 |
| Next: |
re: Cut off end of sentence by mistake - wordnix 04:39 pm UTC 09/11/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|