| re: Wagner |
|
Posted by:
|
steven_stuart 11:00 pm UTC 09/20/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: Wagner - daveake 10:38 pm UTC 09/20/08 |
|
Then Pudding has no reason to doubt. I hope he reads your post. He asked me why I was almost certain that Wagner is Jim. Or I better say Jim Steinman. In case anyone thinks I mean Jim Cypherd.
> > Maybe JD could tell us if Wagner was actually Jim.
>
> She has; he is.
>
> Dave
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Wagner - daveake 10:38 pm UTC 09/20/08 |
| Next: |
re: Wagner - Pudding 02:02 am UTC 09/21/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|