re: If Wagner was a fake | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Pudding 11:26 am UTC 09/21/08 |
In reply to: | re: If Wagner was a fake - steven_stuart 10:48 am UTC 09/21/08 |
Dave never said she posted, but apparently she has confirmed that it is him by other means. Why do I doubt Wagner is Jim? Well...Jim has had a decade to post on Rockman before now and he hasn't. His first post on his blog was some random thoughts about Sarah Palin amongst other random thoughts. The way Jim writes ISN'T that difficult to immitate at all. There's a 'Barnum Effect' with some fans who want so much for it to be Jim, that they'd relinquish any possibility of it not actually being him by throwing logic out of the window, for that moment of talking with their hero. Obviously I have no evidence that it isn't Jim, but equally I have no evidence or clarification that it is. All it would take for me to be convinced that it is Jim is for JD to say so on the board. She's obviously mentioned it to some people, but not on the board, why the big secret? > I didn't see the post by JD either but Dave said that it > was posted. So I don't know why someone thought that > Wagner was/is Jim Cypherd. Pudding, what made you doubt > that Wagner was actually Jim? > > > I know you re-appeared when this Wagner person appeared > > and I never saw any post by JD. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: If Wagner was a fake - Smeghead 11:22 pm UTC 09/21/08 |
Next: | re: If Wagner was a fake - Leesa 01:52 pm UTC 09/22/08 |
Thread: |
|