| re: I am not Mr. Egg/ I am not negative | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 10:35 pm UTC 09/23/08 |
| In reply to: | re: I am not Mr. Egg/ I am not negative - Pudding 07:54 pm UTC 09/23/08 |
| Its not gibberish. But I should have used paragraphs. > That's a long post of utter gibberish with no breaks. > > > I am not Mr. Egg. I now know who Susan is. Although I > > don't know why Pudding's post about her was so horrible. > > Thanks to you I now know that Jim Cypherd is a fictional > > character. > > I don't know why Pudding is so worried about who is Susan > > and who is Mr. Egg. Belmont has also been accused of being > > Mr. Egg and Susan. And for Dave, Vulvania changed the > > thread name to Belmont when she replied to him. What's so > > shocking about that? People change the thread subject line > > all the time. As for Pudding's remarks about dual > > personalities, I am only posting under this one name. But > > I heard that was not the case for Leesa (who pretended to > > be upset that I invoked Jim Cypherd's name when she > > herself published a rant against Susan during the Wagner > > posts - saying that she didn't know why Susan hadn't been > > brought to court for the Jim Cypherd claims). I wonder why > > Pudding worried about my writing: "I really enjoyed > > reading your response. You make some great points." There > > are people out there claiming that they created Jim's > > music (and I'm not saying that it's Susan - I do not wish > > to invoke her name). There are people saying that BOOH > > will fail (and it is Wagner's favourite project at the > > moment) and yet Pudding jumps on me for complimenting > > Jackster. I'm sorry that Smeghead believes Pudding because > > I had traded some good posts with him. I can assure > > Smeghead that I am not going to cause trouble for him or > > anyone else. The post that Pudding picked up on was about > > Operas Vs. Musicals. I don't know what possible harm that > > conversation could have made to Pudding or anyone else. It > > was certainly not an attempt to cause trouble. Wordnix > > thought that I was Mr. Egg because I said that Obsidian > > was now New York and no longer California. It's true. > > Maybe Wagner could post about it. Wordnix said that > > everyone except Susan deserves another chance. This is > > because he was Jackster. From looking back at the old > > posts I see that both Jackster and Mr. Egg sometimes found > > it difficult to win friends and influence people. But > > surely the Susan character deserves another chance too (is > > she real or did my friend Ryan invent her?). > > Pudding wrote an absolutely vicious post about her and it > > would seem that she is not allowed on to the board to > > defend herself. Smeghead told me that she invented Jim > > Cypherd when Jim blogged saying that he had never met her. > > She was probably embarrassed and didn't know what else to > > say. I notice that Pudding and Leesa made accusations > > against me in the Is Mr. Egg Back On The Board thread. But > > they didn't want to answer any of my questions. Like what > > exactly did Mr. Egg do wrong? Did he generate the kind of > > complaints that Susan obviously does? I'm sorry to get > > into all this negative stuff. Yesterday I was happy > > posting my opinions about BOOH and DOTV but Pudding and > > Leesa decided to attack me. I enjoy this board when it is > > not negative. And Pudding insists on making it negative. > > He doesn't believe Wagner was Jim. I am attacked for > > complimenting wordnix Jackster. He writes the most vile > > post about Susan when he knows that she is not allowed on > > the board to defend herself (and that was completely out > > of the blue and for no reason). Smeghead's post about > > Susan was quite different. It was in response to me > > talking about Jim Cypherd and it was clinical and not > > hateful. I like the board when it is positive. Like if you > > read back a while, Jsteinfan came up with the really great > > idea of Bat Out Of Hell as a computer game. I posted my > > agreement and suggested that the story could be Jim's > > Obsidian concept. There was nothing negative going on. And > > there was nothing negative about the Operas Vs. Musicals > > thread but Pudding decided to pounce. I really wonder what > > this Mr. Egg character did to Pudding to make him so > > sensitive. Even if I was Mr. Egg, why would he care? And > > to Dave, I changed the thread to Pudding's name and > > Leesa's name because I was having to defend myself, which > > can be an uncomfortable position to be in. Vulvania > > changed her thread line to Belmont because she was > > speaking to Belmont. It makes sense to do that. I'm sorry > > Mr. Egg also made sense sometimes. Or was he completely > > stupid? I don't know. Pudding is the Mr. Egg expert but he > > won't tell me. He attacked me and ran for cover. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: I am not Mr. Egg/ I am not negative - Pudding 07:54 pm UTC 09/23/08 |
| Next: | BTW: - Pudding 07:59 pm UTC 09/23/08 |
| Thread: | |