| re: Sorry, names LOL, but Buckwins |
|
Posted by:
 |
wordnix 11:26 pm UTC 09/25/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: Sorry, names LOL, but Buckwins - Pudding 11:19 pm UTC 09/25/08 |
|
No doubt he will, but it's not just me. Half the forum knows, whether you take Wagner's identity with a grain of salt or not.
> I'm sure Justin will be pleased that you're able to find
> out things about his relationship with Jim and he isn't.
> Or are you just making shit up again?
>
> > Yeah, I'm sure he did at one time. However, I think
> > Wagner's brush-off on the forums (yes, it IS Jim, like it
> > or hate it) indicates two things:
> >
> > 1) Justin is not very high in the circle after the "has
> > been" comment
> > 2) He can't really take criticism or dismissal as well as
> > he claims
> >
> > > I believe Justin has better contacts with Jim, since he
> > > did go see a WDTW with him.
> > >
> > > > 18. And again, if you have Jim's or Don Ketteler's email,
> > > > why don't you do the hook-up?
> > > >
> > > > > Your wife was in DOTV and you are looking to a 16 year old
> > > > > kid with delusions of grandeur to hook you up with Jim
> > > > > Steinman?
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That is indeed my wife and I will pass on the love. She
> > > > > > was in Vampires... and survived.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I saw the link to the post about you being Robin Irwin's
> > > > > > > husband? Am I right? Tell her I loved "Titanic" and I play
> > > > > > > the cast album a lot. I knew she was in that and I
> > > > > > > remember her name from there. Didn't know she was in the
> > > > > > > dreaded Vampires...
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Sorry, names LOL, but Buckwins - Pudding 11:19 pm UTC 09/25/08 |
| Next: |
re: Sorry, names LOL, but Buckwins - Pudding 11:46 pm UTC 09/25/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|