| re: What a surpise. A flame from Smeg... | |
|
Posted by: |
LordRahl 12:09 am UTC 09/28/08 |
| In reply to: | re: What a surpise. A flame from Smeg... - Pudding 10:17 pm UTC 09/27/08 |
| Hahaha, true, but I tried not to directly. Well from this point on I'll just not respond at all. > You just have responded. > > > Rather than respond to your negative comments I would just > > like to suggest the moderators look at the kind of > > responses this poster always has and remember where most > > annoying fights come from... > > > > > > > > > > > I am always going to be a fan of > > > > his no matter how bad he sounds. > > > > > > Wow! What kind of Kool Aid do his fans drink to inspire > > > that kind of retarded loyalty? "I don't care how bad a > > > singer sounds I want to listen to him and pay huge amounts > > > of money to do so!" > > > > > > If you don't want negative comments about Load go to one > > > of his boards where truth is forbidden. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: What a surpise. A flame from Smeg... - Pudding 10:17 pm UTC 09/27/08 |
| Next: | re: Meat concert question and PLEASE NO FLAMING! - bellminer 08:48 pm UTC 09/27/08 |
| Thread: | |