I'm not assuming that that's all, read the first half of my last post, where I acknowledge your point that songwriting time and overblown production were equally to blame, but to say that his voice or lack thereof was NOT responsible, which seems to be what you're aiming for, is also utter bollocks.
> Double SIGH...every artists sounds different live to when
> they're in the studio. I'm pointing out that your
> assumption that Bat II took so long was purely based on
> Meats vocals or lack of, which is utter bollocks.
>
> > Sigh...this is not to say that the vocals were any more or
> > less a contributing factor than the time it took to write
> > songs or the overblown production, but listen to him live
> > at any point in time, even when he was in good voice, and
> > tell me it wasn't a bitch to pull some of that out of
> > Meat.
> >
> > > > Well, Jim is hardly above getting a good voice out of
> > > > vocalists who aren't highly skilled in the technical level
> > > > (just imagine why "Bat II" took so long).
> > >
> > > So are you saying that Bat2 could have been done in at
> > > least half the time had it not been for Meats vocals?
> > > Because that's what it seems like you're saying to me and
> > > nothing to do with the overblown production of the album
> > > or the time it took to write the new songs.
|
