| re: MY POINT IS |
|
Posted by:
 |
rockfenris2005 01:23 am UTC 12/05/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: MY POINT IS - wordnix 12:59 am UTC 12/05/08 |
|
> If that's so, why didn't they do it?
Why don't you ask them?
The fact of the
> matter is that someone on the team didn't want Polanski
> involved in this one, or John Caird and Jim Steinman
> wouldn't have been announced as co-directors from the
> production reading onward.
There's no evidence of that. My understanding is they couldn't find a way to get Polanski on board so they settled for second. In that event, WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE was A) Hired Harold Prince because he's a brilliant and experienced director and B) Jim had a score to settle with him as well.
Jim wanted to put more of a
> stamp on this one, and wound up with less of one. Serves
> him right. You don't mess with a working product.
There's still no evidence of that. I personally think Jim was advised by Sonenberg and his entourage.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: MY POINT IS - wordnix 12:59 am UTC 12/05/08 |
| Next: |
re: MY POINT IS - Pudding 08:56 am UTC 12/05/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|