| re: What's the point? | |
|
Posted by: |
Pudding 03:24 am UTC 12/17/08 |
| In reply to: | re: What's the point? - wordnix 03:12 am UTC 12/17/08 |
| For marketting purposes then you'd be better calling it 25 years or even 21 years, but it still wouldn't be true. Bat Out Of Hell: A Rock Tribute would probably be better. > Yeah, but for marketing purposes, it's better to think 30 > years than 31. Odd years are taboo for some reason. Go > figure. > > > The 30th Anniversary of Bat Out Of Hell was last year or > > had that small fact slipped you by? > > > > > I know, the working title is a bit sucky, but imagine > > > these artists in tribute to what is arguably the most > > > successful work ever done by Jim Steinman. If you like > > > these ideas, or even if you don't, throw in your own! > > > Wagner, I know you've got some favorites too, so toss 'em > > > in the hat! > > > > > > Bat Out of Hell - The Who > > > The ultimate arena rock band performing the ultimate > > > arena rock track. It's sort of like "Baba O'Riley" crossed > > > with Bruce Springsteen crossed with Peter Pan as it is, so > > > why not let the ultimate pretentious rockers take on the > > > ultimate in pretentious rock? > > > > > > For Crying Out Loud - Elton John > > > The kind of OTT piano ballad that one would expect to > > > hear from Elton at this stage in his career. Think > > > "Goodbye Yellow Brick Road" or the '97 version of "Candle > > > in the Wind," with a tasteful string arrangement, and > > > maybe that boy soprano choir that Jim is so fond of, > > > Mahler style. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: What's the point? - wordnix 03:12 am UTC 12/17/08 |
| Next: | re: What's the point? - Vin 02:34 pm UTC 12/17/08 |
| Thread: |
|