Title refers to post, not to my response to your message.
> It's not bogus just because it didn't happen--things were
> in development (and can be PROVEN to have been so) and
> then fell apart. As a result I now know why Jim doesn't
> like to talk about most of his projects after an initial
> mention - in show biz, nothing is firm until it's in
> writing and actually about to happen.
>
> It was an ill-advised early announcement of a production
> that never came to pass, and that's all it was. I won't
> deny that a lot of stuff I've said is lies, but "Trauma"
> was not, and looking at the idea now, it's unfortunate
> that it never came together.
>
> > The point is, if you and Ryan are linked to this Haase
> > character in one way or another on bogus productions in
> > the past, then how can anyone believe what Ryan is saying
> > now?
> >
> > > And here I thought we'd got past this, eh? Yes, I lied. I
> > > admit it. And I am ashamed of it. Okay? Is that what
> > > everyone wanted to hear? I learned my lesson, and it's
> > > over.
> > >
> > > As for Haase, best of luck to him, but there is no love
> > > lost between me and him for various reasons. Quick note
> > > about "Trauma": that was less of a lie, and more of me
> > > learning not to post about projects before we were 100%
> > > certain they would come to fruition. "Trauma" did not.
> > > (For those keeping score, Haase actually parted ways with
> > > me because of my lying, which is why I wish him the best,
> > > but there is no love lost between us.)
> > >
> > > > When it comes to bullshit, you and Ryan are the gift that
> > > > just keeps giving. Is anything you two say the truth?
> > > >
> > > > http://musicals.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=643848
> > > >
> > > > > Side note: While that's not exactly a ringing endorsement
> > > > > coming from a paragon of dishonesty, take it from one who
> > > > > knows that Haase settles for nothing less than the best.
> > > >
|
