HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: jim related

Posted by:
Pudding 10:05 pm UTC 02/27/09
In reply to: re: jim related - Rob 07:49 pm UTC 02/27/09

I'd never heard of that track before and I'm glad I hadn't because it's shite.

The only time I've really experienced techno and enjoyed it was when I've been smashed off my tits, so maybe later after a few beers I'll give it another go...LOL

> Depends what you mean by techno.
>
> Surely you remember the seminal 80s minor hit 'Bela
> Lugosi's Dead', Pud?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zq7xyjU-jsU
>
> > Can techno be dark?
> >
> > > All of Bat 2 had a more dark, techno, Bova feel to it.
> > > Good Girls also is much more up and piano on Pandora than
> > > Bat 2.
> > >
> > > > I am wondering why the incredible piano arrangements on
> > > > Frying Pan and Rock and Roll Dreams were left out on the
> > > > Bat 2 versions. I can imagine why they didn't use them on
> > > > Rock and Roll dreams cause this version is less up tempo
> > > > and got a more deeper and surreal feeling, but I really
> > > > miss the piano on frying Pan. What is left over are just
> > > > some notes.


reply |

Previous: re: jim related - Rob 07:49 pm UTC 02/27/09
Next: re: jim related - Rob 07:50 pm UTC 02/27/09

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE