re: Letter From Porkington | |
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 11:29 pm UTC 03/30/09 |
In reply to: | re: Letter From Porkington - bellminer 11:07 pm UTC 03/30/09 |
I didn't mention Porkington much. I asked about him at the end of a long post. For some reason, those who replied picked up on Porkigton and ignored the rest of the post. I didn't mention Cypherd by name. I just talked about a shadowy ghost writer. Loads of posters have been talking about Susan and Susan's blog. Dave (for example) said: "Born To Bullshit", regarding her Springsteen page. Pudding often posts about Susan but Evil One doesn't mind. When I said I was not Mr. Egg, I sort of meant it because I don't do the things that Mr. Egg did. Mr. Egg is a past life for me. BTW, how did you know that Susan said she had nothing to do with steven_stuart? Was it on her blog? I notice that she has erased huge chunks of her blog. I exchanged many emails with her and I think she is afraid of being taken to court about the Cypherd claims. > He posted the list because you've been posting a lot about > Torkington and Cypherd lately. And it turns out he was > right, wasn't he? Mr. Egg was on the list, and you just > admitted you're Mr. Egg, which shows that > href="http://www.jimsteinman.com/messageboard/d.php?id=25040">you're > a liar. My advice to you is this: Drop it. All you're > doing is escalating the situation, which will only hurt > you. Better be careful, or you may find yourself banned > again like Jackster/Wordnix. I'm not trying to threaten or > insult you, I'm just trying to help. > > > You make an accusation and refuse to back it up or even > > just discuss it. Why did a letter from Porkington prompt > > you to publish that list? Probably you will refuse to > > answer. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Letter From Porkington - bellminer 11:07 pm UTC 03/30/09 |
Next: | re: Letter From Porkington - bellminer 11:53 pm UTC 03/30/09 |
Thread: |
|