HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

Every single poster is responsible

Posted by:
Steven 05:06 pm UTC 04/21/09
In reply to: re: A Tale Of Two Thugs - steven_stuart 10:24 am UTC 04/21/09

> They are not ignoring me. I can assure you.

And you are not ignoring them. I can assure you.
Why not set a good example instead of just waiting for the others to change?


> They have
> switched from calling me a lying cunt (many times)

(Repeat mode... we already know that in detail.)

> to
> saying that my posts are immature and retarded.

(Repeat mode... we already know that in detail.)


> I quoted Klasien because she understood the situation. I
> can't move without being "hit over the head" by Smeg.

(Repeat mode... we already know that in detail.)


> I remember one time, ages ago, when Pudding had a go at me
> and you asked who had called "the board police". You
> seemed to understand my dilema then.

I also voiced my opinion on Smeghead's and Pudding's periodic witch hunt just two weeks ago, as you might remember. I can easily both "understand your dilemma" and critically view your behaviour at the same time. -- This is not about "you're either with me or against me". It is about board members behaving in a way that helps keeping this forum a place for discussing Steinman-related and other interesting things, rather than for exchanging childish vulgarities etc.
And if you, as a board member like everyone else here, behave in a way that isn't helpful in keeping this a nice place I can criticize your behaviour just as much as I criticized Pudding's or Smeghead's.
And that doesn't have anything to do with criticizing you/Smeghead/Pudding/anyone else as a person. I talk about behaviour.





reply |

Previous: re: A Tale Of Two Thugs - steven_stuart 10:24 am UTC 04/21/09
Next: re: Every single poster is responsible - steven_stuart 05:43 pm UTC 04/21/09

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE