| re: Is this it for 2009? | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 08:34 pm UTC 04/23/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Is this it for 2009? - Pudding 07:56 pm UTC 04/23/09 |
| > I can't believe a single word that you say because there's > nothing that you've said that either hasn't been said > before or is stating the blind obvious. If its been said before or its stating the obvious, then you should believe me. I have been told not to say anything outside the above. If they can make Jim silent, they can make me silent too. Actually, you got me out of trouble when you first said that I hadn't printed anything that hadn't been printed already because some people thought that I had broken the rule (especially with the DVDs) and talked about things that are not publicly known. I thank you for that. I would rather endure your rath than their rath. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Is this it for 2009? - daveake 02:18 am UTC 04/24/09 |
| Next: | re: Is this it for 2009? - Smeghead 03:38 pm UTC 04/23/09 |
| Thread: | |