| re: Bat out of Hell 3 - a year on since i played it |
|
Posted by:
 |
Smeghead 11:32 am UTC 04/27/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Bat out of Hell 3 - a year on since i played it - batoutofhell77 04:29 am UTC 04/27/09 |
|
As long as Jim wasn't producing the only songs that should have been used are ones he DIDN'T WRITE.
> I would add "If God could Talk" "What About Love" and
> "Alive" to that list as well, personally.
>
> >
> >
> > > I listened to this album for a first time for a while and
> > > although I thought it was Ok when it came out, it is
> > > pretty hard going getting to the end of it now. It is like
> > > it is on speed the whole way through apart from the end
> > > song. No wonder Meat's voice failed him afterwards! The
> > > pacing is way off and even some obvious Steinman tricks
> > > missed. An example would be Blind as a Bat, the lyric
> > > could do with a female answer at the end of it to set it
> > > off. The album is far too long. I would be interested to
> > > hear what it would be like if it was just 9 tracks and in
> > > what order? Also if Bat out of Hell 3 was just Jim's songs
> > > old and new what should they be if you limited it down to
> > > 9 or 10 songs?
> >
> > The only songs that should have been used would be the
> > following:
> >
> > BRAVER THAN WE ARE
> > BAD FOR GOOD with a totally different arrangement than
> > what Meat used.
> > SEIZE THE NIGHT
> > LAND OF THE PIG
> > CRY TO HEAVEN
> > THE FUTURE AIN'T WHAT IT USED TO BE no duet here
> > IF IT AIN'T BROKE
> > WHAT PART OF MY BODY HURTS THE MOST if Jim allowed it
> > ONLY WHEN I FEEL
> > DATE WITH DESTINY
> > BLIND AS A BAT
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Bat out of Hell 3 - a year on since i played it - batoutofhell77 04:29 am UTC 04/27/09 |
| Next: |
re: Bat out of Hell 3 - a year on since i played it - Evil_One 12:45 pm UTC 04/27/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|