not logged in
| re: RIP Michael Jackson | |
Posted by:  |
rockfenris2005 09:31 pm UTC 06/28/09 |
| In reply to: | re: RIP Michael Jackson - Pudding 08:52 pm UTC 06/28/09 |
Here is the First Secret from Sister Lúcia of Jesus and of the Immaculate Heart: Our Lady showed us a great sea of fire which seemed to be under the earth. Plunged in this fire were demons and souls in human form, like transparent burning embers, all blackened or burnished bronze, floating about in the conflagration, now raised into the air by the flames that issued from within themselves together with great clouds of smoke, now falling back on every side like sparks in a huge fire, without weight or equilibrium, and amid shrieks and groans of pain and despair, which horrified us and made us tremble with fear. The demons could be distinguished by their terrifying and repulsive likeness to frightful and unknown animals, all black and transparent. This vision lasted but an instant. How can we ever be grateful enough to our kind heavenly Mother, who had already prepared us by promising, in the first Apparition, to take us to heaven. Otherwise, I think we would have died of fear and terror. That's kind of what Rockman Record reminds me of these days. > Seems you condone child molestation you sick fuck. > > > Who's to say that he wasn't being blackmailed . Just > > because they went public doesn't mean blackmail wasn't > > their intention, his reputation was falling apart and so > > he got rid of the problem. sounds like Blackmail to me. > > They probably went public with their bull shit so they > > would get paid off. Oh I was referring to pudding not you > > about the whole able so support their family thing. I was > > insinuating Pudding was your wife....lol > > > > > > > Funny how you didn't address my theory of him being > > > > blackmailed > > > > > > What's to address? It is an asinine theory. If you are > > > being blackmailed with something that isn't true then it > > > isn't done in public. For him to pay off someone who was > > > publicly accusing him is the same as admitting he did it. > > > He wasn't protecting his name. Your theory falls apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > I recall reading once that you dont provide > > > > for your family. What great role model for your children, > > > > Its a safe bet they'll grow up resening you and your wife > > > > smeghead. > > > > > > And where did you read that? I support my family (along > > > with my wife who works)... > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: RIP Michael Jackson - rockfenris2005 11:26 pm UTC 06/28/09 |
| Next: | re: RIP Michael Jackson - rockfenris2005 01:42 pm UTC 06/27/09 |
| Thread: | |