| re: Hold the phone | |
|
Posted by: |
Rob 12:22 am UTC 06/29/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Hold the phone - Pudding 12:07 am UTC 06/29/09 |
| That's as maybe, but you're still missing the point. None of us are condoning child abuse. We are saying that in Jacko's case it remains unproved. If he really was a child abuser, then he deserves all the scorn and bile that you can pour on him. But, and it's a big but, no-one on this board really knows one way or another. Now, stop trying to wriggle out of addressing the other points. I'm sure your tabloid ridden brain can manage that if you try very hard. > > Having kids is irrelevant. > > NO, it's very relevant. Had I not had children then > perhaps my views of Jacko would be slightly different. The > protection and wellbeing of my kids are at the forefront > of nearly everything I do. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Hold the phone - Pudding 12:07 am UTC 06/29/09 |
| Next: | re: Hold the phone - Pudding 12:47 am UTC 06/29/09 |
| Thread: |
|