| re: And also (Steven Stuart, and cheerleaders, hope you're reading) | |
|
Posted by: |
Jacqueline 09:15 pm UTC 07/02/09 |
| In reply to: | And also (Steven Stuart, and cheerleaders, hope you're reading) - rockfenris2005 03:20 pm UTC 07/02/09 |
| Wow - you've outdone yourself, Ryan. Talk about creating an incident where none has taken place in order to feel sorry for yourself. Oh well, maybe "Steven Stuart and cheerleaders" will help lick your wounds. > > It doesn't matter what gets posted especially if it's > anything of any interest in any other normal forum. I try > to make an effort to cover up the recent arguments that > were only making this place look worse than it does and > it's either ignored or full of confusing and lame jokes. I > tried to make a difference, I really did, but if there's > so much else to do with my time than be around negative > influences that are a waste of time, I'm not going to > post. So consider this my final post. > > > > > You were having a go at me because you claimed the > > information had already been posted, which made me look > > stupid. I defended myself by saying that the official > > synopsis had not been posted before and I did it in a > > relatively straightforward matter that was not meant to be > > intended as "snarkiness". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow, unneccessary snark much? Did I say it was the > > > > official synopsis? And how does the official synopsis > > > > vary from what I posted, anyway? > > > > > > > > > > That's not a snark. I was just pointing a few things out. > > > I use capitol letters sparingly sometimes. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: And also (Steven Stuart, and cheerleaders, hope you're reading) - daveake 09:41 pm UTC 07/02/09 |
| Next: | re: And also (Steven Stuart, and cheerleaders, hope you're reading) - Pudding 07:41 pm UTC 07/02/09 |
| Thread: | |