HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jacqueline

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 07:27 am UTC 07/03/09
In reply to: Jacqueline - steven_stuart 09:35 pm UTC 07/02/09


She does not like me for reasons that I can, and have, actually explained on many occasions and I have offered peace offerings again. I don't understand why it has to continue, especially when I wanted her to be part of something that, if successful, would make her a very wealthy lady (although she is already wealthy in other ways from having designed this website with all its information). Ah well, that's the life of a writer. Phil Spector hated Jim Steinman too and that's the only way I can live with someone hating me.

> Gosh. You are being critical tonight. I read your post
> down the board where you wrote to Ryan: "Wow - you've
> outdone yourself, Ryan. Talk about creating an incident
> where none has taken place in order to feel sorry for
> yourself. Oh well, maybe "Steven Stuart and cheerleaders"
> will help lick your wounds."
>
> I know you are the boss of the board but I hope you also
> believe in democracy. I don't understand why Pudding and
> Smeghead are allowed to say anything, no matter how crude,
> but you are critical of Ryan.
>
> Like with me and mentioning Susan. Surely you must know
> that Pudding has mentioned Susan many times, including one
> rather crude post when he was saying that Susan had aliens
> growing in her knickers. I mention Susan but I do not
> insult her in the same crude way as Pudding. Yet, as far
> as I know, you have never said anything to Pudding about
> this. Is it because he is old guard?
>
> Also, Smeghead is allowed to constantly call me a "lying
> cunt" and you don't say anything. It's quite a nasty
> insult but it doesn't seem to bother you.
>
>


reply |

Previous: re: Jacqueline - daveake 08:59 am UTC 07/03/09
Next: PS. - rockfenris2005 07:36 am UTC 07/03/09

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE