YOU CAN'T PROVE IT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXIST | |
Posted by: ![]() |
rockfenris2005 11:04 am UTC 07/03/09 |
In reply to: | Also - rockfenris2005 10:58 am UTC 07/03/09 |
> > That you pass comment on something I am innocent of, which > I pointed out in the previous post, in addition to > allowing the behaviour that sometimes go on here, I also > find it disturbing that you do not prove the veracity of a > 30 year veteran producer when he asked you to defend him > on this forum. > > In that case, too chilling. > > > > > > I report what I see. I never state it as fact. List some > > or all examples with links and at the very least you will > > see that I do not state them with fact. I really don't > > know what your problem is that you have to attack someone > > offering peace and goodwill while you say nothing about > > those stirring arguments below and treating others with > > disdain and disrespect. It's a very distorted outlook, in > > my opinion, and that it comes from the leader of this > > community is even more distorted. > > > > In this case, too sad. > > > > > I don't hate you or anyone for that matter. You spew too > > > much wrong information - all of the time - on so many > > > topics. The latest - that is was my husband you were > > > responding to in the thread below. Thanks for the invite > > > - but I'll pass on my share of your legacy. Too funny. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: And also - daveake 06:05 pm UTC 07/03/09 |
Next: | re: Thanks (and Jacqueline) - Pudding 07:48 am UTC 07/03/09 |
Thread: |