| re: Michael Beinhorn and Bat 3 | |
|
Posted by: |
Conas 02:03 pm UTC 07/14/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Michael Beinhorn and Bat 3 - Pudding 03:16 am UTC 07/14/09 |
| You can't say that would have been the case. It might not have been all that genuine either. Nowadays I question Jim's ability to write anything of the high standard of the past. Can he even write good songs anymore? Meat seems to think not, and for once I agree with him. But in fairness to Jim he'd probaly admit he's past it, and just can't write anything good no more. His creative well could have simply dried up. Unlike Meat Loaf who probaly believe's his best years are ahead of him. > > if Jim had been at the helm > and it flopped, then it would have been a genuine Bat > album that had flopped and not some half-baked nonsense > cobbled together. > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Michael Beinhorn and Bat 3 - Pudding 03:16 am UTC 07/14/09 |
| Next: | re: Michael Beinhorn and Bat 3 - Pudding 08:58 pm UTC 07/14/09 |
| Thread: |
|