HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Polanski Is Not Exactly Innocent
Posted by:	Smeghead 10:50 am UTC 10/01/09
In reply to:	re: Polanski Is Not Exactly Innocent - Infinite_Victims 05:02 pm UTC 09/30/09
It is a shame John Rando wasn't the one having sex with a 13 year old. > Bingo! We have a winner!!! > > > > I still don't understand why Michael Jackson is condemed > > on this board when he was found not guilty and Roman is > > supported when he admits everything. > >
reply |
Previous:	re: Polanski Is Not Exactly Innocent - Infinite_Victims 05:02 pm UTC 09/30/09
Next:	Free the man - Pudding 07:07 pm UTC 09/27/09
Thread:

HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE