HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Rebel without a clue & Lovers Again Interpretation?

Posted by:
daveake 06:47 pm UTC 11/02/09
In reply to: re: Rebel without a clue & Lovers Again Interpretation? - Vin 05:55 pm UTC 11/02/09



> He did! Can you imagine Todd Rundgren trying to explain
> to Desmond that he needed to change the "new name you've
> taken" line because a woman was singing the song and there
> was no clear reason why her presumably male ex would need
> to change his name?
>
> "Right, right, that's cool, Des, I get that you're trying
> to make an artistic point with some room for
> interpretation on the part of the listener, but, you see,
> it just doesn't make any fucking sense. Not a lick. Now go
> sit in the corner and let me make this record, okay?"

Photobucket


reply |

Previous: re: Rebel without a clue & Lovers Again Interpretation? - Vin 05:55 pm UTC 11/02/09
Next: re: Rebel without a clue - Evil_One 07:09 pm UTC 10/28/09

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE