re: sp? | |
Posted by: ![]() |
rockfenris2005 06:44 am UTC 03/02/07 |
In reply to: | re: sp? - Pudding 06:08 am UTC 03/02/07 |
> > What's so freaky about not appearing pretentious, as if > > your opinion is the definitive review? > > It's freaky that you keep harping on about it. And I never > said my opinion was the definitive one, I gave it, I know > some others agree with it, obviously you've got a shit > about others not agreeing with you, but hey! who gives a > fuck? apart from you that is *rolls eyes* > > Pud A problem a lot of my critics have with me is that I degrade myself to arguments that can only go nowhere and cause un-necessary friction. Take AG Awesome for example. If he had ignored everything you said he would be still here today, adding a positive atmosphere to the forum that he seemed to be doing before you riled him up. After that, well, I'm not condoning any of it but it easily could have been prevented if he had ignored it. As I should be doing now. As for your opinion. Usually when you state something that's not an absolute fact, and is more based on your opinion, you say "IMO". IMO was missing from your sentence, and it should have been there simply because it came across as your opinion, or at least something that is not shared universally. I don't care if 10 people agree with you, or not, I can name 10 people who agree with ME. See what I mean? IMO | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: sp? - Pudding 06:08 am UTC 03/02/07 |
Next: | re: sp? - Pudding 10:21 am UTC 03/02/07 |
Thread: |
|