| re: Jim Steinman Collections | |
|
Posted by: |
EvilNickname 03:53 pm UTC 11/30/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim Steinman Collections - steven_stuart 03:48 pm UTC 11/30/09 |
| For me, it is. Reason the first: it was my first introduction to Meat and, later, Jim. So there's the nostalgia factor. Second: Paradise isn't on it. On the other hand: it has no FCOL. > > > That's a very interesting philosophical observation. I > > > think Bob Dylan would like that one. I certainly do. > > > > Let's just, theoretically, if I lost my whole collection, > > and Bat II was the only part of it I had left, I'd get by. > > Certainly. That album is beyond gold. > > Do you think that Bat 2 is even better than Bat 1? Or are > they both so good that its not possible to say that one is > better than the other? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim Steinman Collections - steven_stuart 04:13 pm UTC 11/30/09 |
| Next: | re: Jim Steinman Collections - rockfenris2005 03:56 pm UTC 11/30/09 |
| Thread: |
|