re: sp? |
|
Posted by:
|
Tremorlor 10:07 am UTC 03/02/07 |
In reply to: |
re: sp? - rockfenris2005 10:02 am UTC 03/02/07 |
|
You don't acknowledge Puds' viewpoint eg.
> Wrong again. I am not being inconsistent. Acknowledge my
> viewpoint, as I acknowledge everyone else's, and we'll go
> from there.
>
> This is not about me being the definitive Lord over
> everyone else. Matter of fact, I'd find that role rather
> daunting
>
>
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
Previous: |
re: sp? - rockfenris2005 10:02 am UTC 03/02/07 |
Next: |
re: sp? - rockfenris2005 10:15 am UTC 03/02/07 |
|
Thread: |
|