| re: Rage Against The Machine Is Christmas Number One |
|
Posted by:
 |
nadja 09:37 pm UTC 12/21/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Rage Against The Machine Is Christmas Number One - Evil_One 07:38 pm UTC 12/21/09 |
|
More likely genuine, there's a lot of money to be made out of the X Factor winners, a gut punch like this from the get-go couldn't be very beneicial in the long run.
I agree with Conas' comment about neither being worth it. When was the last time an actual Christmas song was Christmas number one?
I bought the Blobby song back in the day. I feel kind of bad now, because that's what knocked AFL from the top spot! :p
> You don't think that it could just be a ploy to increase
> sales, what with the X Factor winner, Simon Cowell and
> RATM all ultimately being owned by Sony?
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Rage Against The Machine Is Christmas Number One - Evil_One 07:38 pm UTC 12/21/09 |
| Next: |
re: Rage Against The Machine Is Christmas Number One - Conas 10:45 pm UTC 12/21/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|