| re: Meat Loaf's 'other half' |
|
Posted by:
 |
Scaramouche 07:06 pm UTC 12/29/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Meat Loaf's 'other half' - steven_stuart 06:23 pm UTC 12/29/09 |
|
> I think that the Meat Loaf Factor is one of the most
> difficult things the producers are facing.
Not really. I bet the producers would love to use Meat as much as possible in the promo (if he is willing).
I'm assuming Jim would still want to call the show 'Neverland' (if it's still about Peter Pan?) but has had to compromise with the name change to get investment and/or personal gain ($$$$). In doing so he has created the Meat association, which he may or may not want?
> Which would be better for the show at the end of the day?
Well as it is now called BOOH, Meat involvement (in the promo) is almost inevitable and I can't see it doing any harm, as long as they emphasise at all times what the show is about (ie - not the Meat Loaf story).
> They could do a casting show on telly and make Meat one > of the judges.
I really like the idea of a TV casting show. Be interesting to know whether the producers are pushing for this or not. I can see Meat being a guest judge for one week, but not the whole series.
> Jim may decide that Meat's inclusion in the publicity
> will somehow take away from the fact that this is "Jim
> Steinman's Bat Out Of Hell".
If Jim wants people to know this is his 'baby' then he has to get out and do a ton of promo, and the easiest way to get this across is by doing a casting show.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Meat Loaf's 'other half' - steven_stuart 06:23 pm UTC 12/29/09 |
| Next: |
re: Meat Loaf's 'other half' - steven_stuart 07:39 pm UTC 12/29/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|